tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6569735948568642990.post8469070989337493015..comments2023-07-09T03:36:51.702-04:00Comments on The obsessions of an electronics freak: More on Samsung; the good, the bad, and the ugly.Electrofreakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00831677178752927710noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6569735948568642990.post-32520892852092961532011-01-20T11:44:44.360-05:002011-01-20T11:44:44.360-05:00It could very well be Tom, at least I hope that th...It could very well be Tom, at least I hope that that's the case. <br /><br />The statement by "The.Samsung.Secret" was very well-worded and seemed to be an educated opinion, but it's possible that it's an anonymous stab at Samsung from a disgruntled employee or even another smartphone manufacturer.Electrofreakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00831677178752927710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6569735948568642990.post-80230899289931940992011-01-20T02:20:55.094-05:002011-01-20T02:20:55.094-05:00I'm thinking this was just someone trolling.
...I'm thinking this was just someone trolling. <br />The fact that Samsung was so quick to deny it and nobody that worked for Sprint confirmed it.<br />I'm more inclined to believe that " I work for Sprint at a service and repair store. We had a memo that the Epic was suppose to get Froyo on Dec 26th, but that they pulled it because it bricked half their test phones and needed more work. I do know that the Intercept had an official update go out for Froyo that bricked roughly 10% of customer's phones and we were instructed to put them back on 2.1, I do know someone who has a legitimate carrier copy of Froyo on their Intercept, its not a Galaxy phone but its still Samsung. What you're saying Samsung is doing(which sounds right/true) is pretty petty. HTC released an update to Froyo for the Evo about 2 weeks after the phone launched. That's what manufacturers should do IMO."Time lost..https://www.blogger.com/profile/11298638111897230492noreply@blogger.com